I run a blog called Maximum Progress which covers topics in economics, mathematics, philosophy, history, and technology. You can read all of my essays on my Substack here: https://maximumprogress.substack.com/
Maxwell Tabarrok
The Offense-Defense Balance Rarely Changes
Something Is Getting Harder To Find But It’s Not Ideas
Intellectual Property Is Worse Than You Think
Does the Vegas Sphere Mark the End of Monument Stagnation?
Interland: The Country In The Intersection
Did Medieval Peasants Have More Vacation Time Than Us?
Enlightenment Values in a Vulnerable World
If you haven’t read it already, ‘Where’s my Flying Car’ is basically a direct answer to the question you pose here. Hall has scientific, technological, political, and cultural analyses of several possibly impactful technologies like flying cars, nuclear energy, nanotech, etc.
American Acceleration vs Development
We Need Major, But Not Radical, FDA Reform
Surgery Works Well Without The FDA
Land Reclamation is in the 9th Circle of Stagnation Hell
Fertility as Metascience
Why Governments Can’t be Trusted to Protect the Long-run Future
I definitely agree that a bigger difference between original investment costs and copying costs makes patents more beneficial, but all of the criticisms I pointed out still apply. The Pharma industry spends billions on patent courts and lobbying. This has to be subtracted from the benefits that they provide, in addition to all the welfare losses from super expensive name-brand drugs.
What do you think about using prizes or direct subsidies for high CAPEX projects instead of IP?
In a more meta sense, I wonder if it is possible to have patents only for high CAPEX industries. It may be that the lobbying forces will inevitably push to expand the reach of patents, and one cannot separate the benefits of high CAPEX patents from the costs of low CAPEX ones.
Many of the movements you are involved in and praise (e.g econ and EA) use online writing/blogging to communicate and generate new ideas.
Will this continue in recognizable form despite AIs surpassing human skill at writing? Are the young people who are investing in this skill learning how to use the hand powered loom in 1800?