Given that the supreme court frequently ruled against NEPA, why aren’t there more cases involving NEPA in front of the supreme court to curb its excesses?
Christian Kleineidam
Karma: 11
Given that the supreme court frequently ruled against NEPA, why aren’t there more cases involving NEPA in front of the supreme court to curb its excesses?
That still seems surprising to me. The Koch’s for example seem to be very willing to spend a lot of money think tanks to advance the public good as they see it.
Is there a reason why billionaires like the Koch’s who are willing to spend money on policy changes don’t care about NEPA?